Talk:First of October (band)
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Mbdfar in topic 2021-2023?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verb Tense edit
Are we sure the article should be in past tense? The band is still active - albeit once a year - as of 2022. TheXug (talk) 17:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- I think it's an interesting question, considering the members state that the band only exists one day a year. With that definition, the article should only be present tense on October 1st, and past tense every other day. Mbdfar (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- I feel the "officially only a band for one day a year" may also be a problem in terms of the "years active" part. If they do only officially exist for one day a year, then the years should be listed like "2018, 2019, 2021, 2022". But if the band continues for like 20 more years that is going to get to be very long.
- I think present tense makes the most sense even though it may be technically wrong. BeatlesNathaniel (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
2021-2023? edit
I realized that there is one title stating 2021-2022 and the next one being 2023-present, wouldn't it be smarter to just put it as 2021-2023 and putting Across the Road under that one? Dalto17 (talk) 08:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)