Talk:Fiona Compton

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MrsSnoozyTurtle in topic Apparently "pointless" tags


Fiona Compton

Question about a source edit

Can the following link be added to the article.

https://travelnoire.com/fiona-compton-on-calling-out-colonial-narratives-and-retelling-caribbean-history?item=6

Thanks in advance. 24GT (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

added thank you Author2022 (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Political edit

Ddd Bin nano (talk) 17:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Additional sources edit

These were additional sources discovered during the AfD process.

  • Mensah, Lou (August 26, 2020). "The street party that revolutionised Britain". BBC News. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  • DJ Ace (August 21, 2019). "General Levy and Fiona Compton Talk Notting Hill Carnival 2019". BBC Radio 1Xtra. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  • Nicholas, Toni (May 7, 2014). "Compton Sisters: Jazz & Arts Jewels". St. Lucia Star. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  • "Ethiopian trained, London schooled St Lucian designers to present collections at CFW". The Gleaner. June 5, 2015. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  • Gonzales, Rochelle (December 10, 2016). "Woman of the Week – Fiona Compton". The Voice of Saint Lucia. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  • Fisher, Gillian (August 29, 2020). "This weekend's digital event is a chance for Notting Hill Carnival to return to its activist roots". Metro. Retrieved February 11, 2023.

Hopefully they can be used to expand the article at some point. SilverserenC 22:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apparently "pointless" tags edit

Hello Silverseren. I beg to differ with your description of these tags (link), since they are intended to highlight legitimate issues.

Also, could you please explain why the "failed verification" tag that you removed is "just incorrect"? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

What exactly are you saying failed verification for the first sentence? It has multiple references that discuss Compton. As for the other tags, I rewrote that section of the article to fix the language. SilverserenC 23:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
It seems odd that someone can dismiss something as "just incorrect" without even understanding what it is referring to. It is true that the citations discuss Compton, however they do not support all of the claims in the sentence.
Your re-write of that section has made a good improvement to the tone of that text. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply