 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Abstract of Fine Chemicals - The Inductry and the Business ISBN 978-0-470-62767-9. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011113010010141. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
On the copypasted text edit
See User:PeterRPollak. --vuo (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
No answer in 11 days, so deleting. --vuo (talk) 22:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete article? edit
Since this entire article is unsubstantiated assertions and is in places demonstrably license-violating copied text, I think we should consider deleting it altogether and let someone start from scratch if the article is truly needed, rather than trying to patch the existing skeleton into something defensible as an "encyclopedic" entry.
What do you think?
Refimprove tag edit
Added tag. Article has few references, almost all from 2009-2011. Most aren't online resources. I don't have the knowledge or energy to attempt improving it, but it seems to need a bit of work. Reads like it was written by one person and hasn't been changed much for about ten years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Champlax (talk • contribs) 12:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)