Talk:Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Untitled edit

This doesn't make sense. Wikisource shows that section 361 of the USA PATRIOT Act formed FinCEN in law. How can this be if they were around since the 1990s? - Ta bu shi da yu 14:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

as you can see below they seemed to be moving sections of code around. I haven't done an actual diff, but the part you referenced has the establishment of FinCEN dated to April 25, 1990. I cut this straight from the link you provided.

Sec. 361. Financial crimes enforcement network. edit

(a) In general- Subchapter I of chapter 3 of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating section 310 as section 311; and
(2) by inserting after section 309 the following new section:

`Sec. 310. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

`(a) In general- The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network established by order of the Secretary of the Treasury (Treasury Order Numbered 105-08, in this section referred to as `FinCEN') on April 25, 1990, shall be a bureau in the Department of the Treasury. Umeboshi 00:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Flagged as POV edit

2009-April-17. The stuff at the top of this reads like it was copied from a PR release. I don't feel confident enough of the Wikipedia guidelines to modify it myself, but it sure looks POV to me. If a more experienced editor (other than the person who added the POV text...) disagrees, please feel free to remove the flag; it's just there to call attention to the question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.144.221 (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Indeed it reads like propaganda of the form "If we dont all stand together the enemy will win!". But sadly I dont feel that I am unbiased enaugh to modify the article. --Zarutian (talk) 18:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Fixed. Judging from the double spaces used after each sentence, the POV description was originally written by a lawyer. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 14:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

rewrote page edit

adding detail and sources. will leave info box up though. --Wuerzele (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Use of [sic] edit

In the second to last sentence of the "History" section, "[sic]" is placed following "one stop shop." If "[sic]" were appropriate to use due to something incorrect or unusual about the phrase, it does not make sense here given that the phrase isn't quoted from the source material cited, rather it seems to be the work of the author of the section. Therefore, it is not a quote in which the author would need to point out that the phrase was written that way by the original author. Additionally, why would the phrase "one stop shop" be in any way incorrect, thus needing the designation "[sic]"?

I don't want to just go in and take it out in case the author or someone else has a decent explanation for this.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kennethlamkl4997 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kennethlamkl4997 (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply