 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
comments edit
Hi sir, m suraj from India I want be a porn star how can i do that.... Plz Help me some Mail I'd.(gahlotonly4u@gmail.com)
Virus Warning on external link edit
My Avast virus scanner says the page on the external link contains a trojan horse called "JS:Packed-AA [Trj]". Please someone confirm that and remove the dangerous link if necessary. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.66.29.50 (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 18:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Movie studio → Film studio – "Film" is the preferred term over "movie" throughout Wikipedia, and this article should also reflect this. --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose movie studio is more commonly used. No indication has been given that it isn't in the nomination. Hot Stop 14:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- It would be in line with nearly all film production articles including major film studio. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Support The naming convention for film articles has been agreed as Film Title (film) not Film Title (movie) for about seven years and there's no reason why this shouldn't follow suit. Other aspects of Wiki also use "film", rather than "movie" so we have MOS:FILM, WikiProject Film etc, as well as more general industry usage (AFI, BFI etc) - SchroCat (^ • @) 15:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Support per WP:MOSFILM for film over movie. Lugnuts (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Support – As per WP:COMMONNAME. Google returns a higher hit rate for "movie studio" (9.4 million)as opposed to "film studio" (6 million); however Google books favors "film studio" (238,000 to 87,000) and likewise Google scholar (8,900 as opposed to 6,000). On the basis of that, the more authoritative usage—in terms of what would qualify as reliable sources—favors "film studio". Betty Logan (talk) 05:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.