This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The sentence on this is bizarrely confusing and not borne out by the only source. I think the source is saying that the Indicia Monasteralia specifies a sign for a secular woman that may resemble a fillet, and so it is assumed that a fillet was regarded as indicative of a secular woman; but it does not specify married or unmarried, except as a vague aside.
The whole article needs either to be expanded to something that actually says something with meaningful references, or deleted as trivial. --ColinFine (talk) 11:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
