Talk:Fiji Times

Fiji Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fiji Times Currently Outdated

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I'd like to make changes to the Fiji Times current Wikipedia page. The current information is outdated and I have been asked by the Fiji Times board to quickly amend the current info on display. I hope you would consider my request and have this update active as soon as possible. Regards Foster679 (talk) 04:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Foster679: If you work for Fiji Times, it would be best to suggest changes here rather than directly edit (along with sources for citation), because of conflict of interest. I think that you also must make a COI declaration on your user page (please read the information at this last link). I have looked at the article history and your changes also seemed very promotional, something which is not acceptable on Wikipedia. We should only report about what reliable sources (ideally secondary) say about the topic, while respecting Wikipedia's interpretation of neutrality. Thanks, PaleoNeonate (talk) 01:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic