Talk:Fiji Airways

Centre alignment

The article has been reformatted to remove the centre alignment as it was causing all of the text beneath the table to appear centred rather than left justified. I could find no examples of other articles formatted in this way, per the request of M i k e y 86 but if there are some (or if you intended a different effect from the one you created), please cite and re-edit. Kind regards--Calabraxthis 18:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

M i k e y 86 , I can see that you are trying to act in good faith, but you are failing to appreciate the consequence of your centring. With the commands that you were using, you were not only centre aligning the table of aircraft which you added, but also the entirety of the text in the sections underneath the table (which looked horrendous). Have a look at my latest edit and see if you can live with compromise? The table should now still appear centred but the sections underneath will be left justified. Kind regards--Calabraxthis 06:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Merge

The separate articel on destinations seems out of place and pretty useless. I suggest it would belong better in the main articel. 68.39.174.238 17:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - common practice is that we have separate articles for airlines and their destinations. No reason to break the rule. Kransky 06:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Support - i think that's the right thing to say. Usually when the destinations list is as small as the Air Pacific one it stays in the same article - see Pacific Blue and Jetstar. IanRitchie 01:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Support - destinations list seems short enough to merge it into the main article. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 02:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Support - destination lists are to be used when the article is far too big. However Air Pacific's destination list is small enough to fit in main article. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 05:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Updated Fleet Table

Hi,

I have updated the fleet table. I have made the following changes.

• Removed the route column. Other airlines do not have this. Makes this one standard to fit in the with others.
• Lined up the seating in configuration into own column according to class. Looks more tidy.
• Added hover over info onto the class codes, column headings and TBA. Gives reader a little bit of extra info.
• Removed the Pacific Sun fleet table. The airline has its own page so the fleet table for that airline should be kept on it own page.
• Removed - Note: Economy is called Pacific Voyager and Business Class is called Tabua - New hover over info now indicated this info.

--Boeing747-412 (talk) 17:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Boeing 787

Air Pacific cancelled its dream liner order so it shouldn't be in the fleet table. Also, why is the 747 not on the fleet table? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.81.139.114 (talk) 05:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Done, also deleted the (from what I know) imaginary 777's, and the 767 which was retired 124.149.168.239 (talk) 05:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC)