Talk:Fibular hemimelia
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Fibular hemimelia.
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Congenital absence of the fibula was copied or moved into Hemimelia with this edit on 10:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Difference with congenital absence of the fibula?
editSo what's the difference between this and congenital absence of the fibula? Should the two articles be merged?
- have suggested merge Tubefurnace (talk) 12:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
they are the exact same, one if just a broken down literal definition. I have the disability. I know this for sure! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emwillia (talk • contribs) 18:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI'm not an expert, but this seems like an obvious case for merge, unless the two things are really different conditions. Tubefurnace (talk) 12:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- It is in fact a case for compulsory merge because two articles about the same subject violates the rule against such content forks. Roger (talk) 08:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- The merge has been completed. Roger (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
What about the tibia?
editPresume it missing too is concomitant. Why is it called fibular if it does affect the much larger other bone and if not why doesn't the tibia suffice? 76.180.168.166 (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- The answer apparently is that there is a range of designations of clinically presented types of the condition. Rarely, the tibia may be more or less normal. More commonly the entire osteo process of the lower leg and foot is abnormal with fusions, missing processes, undeveloped tibia, unusual joints, etc. At some point I would expect these types will be enumerated here. 76.180.168.166 (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- An answer from a person with Fibular Hemimelia and have been a amputee since birth (30 years). I can say that the tibia could suffice but the dangers of fracture and muscle and/or nerve damage may occur. The actual defect is not a standard but a wide range of possibilities; I was lacking a fibula, ankle and foot bones, but have all muscles (I would wiggle toe muscles before revision) with a curved tibia (banana shaped). I have not met another person with the same exact defect; different sides, no curved tibia, or club foot, or even a shorten fibula. There has not been many studies done and I find myself having to explain to doctors what I have, as they have not heard of it. More studies need to be done to find out what is the cause and a better way to treat than bone lengthening or amputation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.127.61.91 (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for that informative reply. I indented your response. Since it's a ubiquitous condition in vertebrates, I imagine it will continue to occur and that the ultimate treatment after birth would be to grow the missing bone tissue in culture from the patients cells. 76.180.168.166 (talk) 10:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Notable People with fibular hemimelia
editWould the dancer Taylor Haines be a suitable addition to the list of people affected by this codition? Barney Bruchstein (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fibular hemimelia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505150916/http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/abstract/49-B/1/59 to http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/abstract/49-B/1/59
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)