Talk:Ferrari FF

Car classification (hatchback / wagon / crossover / estate / shooting brake

The Ferrari FF, which uses shooting brake design with a hatchback and a V12 engine, is classified in grand tourer class. I think it's definitely NOT a hot hatch, because it's too large for the small hatchback class, but some small hatchbacks such as Volvo C30 can be shooting brakes.WKB(talk here/This is not Facebook nor Malaysia) 07:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

It'd be one hell of a hot hatch, that's for sure, but I agree. At best, "hatchback-like" can be used to describe it to those unfamiliar with the term 'shooting-brake'. The classification was changed to hot hatch in this edit. I'll go ahead and change it back. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 13:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

The term Shooting Brake was not familiar to me. I had imagined it was a reference to the aerodynamic properties, not its historical body style. It is a grand tourer according to the Ferrari press release, and the term shooting brake was not used. The 612, its predecessor also was a grand tourer. I see that the Italian and German Wikipedia articles also are using Shooting brake, with the French site using break de chasse as well. I left the term shooting brake, but added the clarification so that an unnecessary break in reading the article is not required. Group29 (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Weight

Curbweight is 1880kg, 1790kg refers to the dryweight http://www.ferrari.com/Spanish/GT_Sport_Cars/Gamma_GT/FF/Ficha_tecnica/Pages/Ficha_Tecnica_FF.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.237.155.241 (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Engine

This might be the largest production engine in a Ferrari, but the Ferrari 712 Can-Am racer from the early 70s had a 7L engine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.97.43 (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

wait... how does that haldex system work then?

the way i'm seeing it here is that it's like an overrunning clutch type affair, so the front wheels only really get drive when the rears start to slip... but, then, how do you get any drive in reverse? and/or would reverse not need to be shorter rather than taller? (there's also the question of whether you might actually want the 80/20 split to be switched around for reverse, as the front wheels would in that situation typically have better grip than the rears...)

or is that completely off the mark? 87.114.206.46 (talk) 02:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ferrari FF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110326182705/http://www.roadandtrack.com:80/tests/impressions/2012-ferrari-ff to http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/impressions/2012-ferrari-ff
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120828140432/http://www.roadandtrack.com:80/future-cars/first/revealed!-the-2012-ferrari-ff to http://www.roadandtrack.com/future-cars/first/revealed!-the-2012-ferrari-ff
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110413184756/http://blogs.insideline.com:80/straightline/2011/03/il-geek-out-ferrari-ff-4rm-all-wheel-drive-system.html to http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2011/03/il-geek-out-ferrari-ff-4rm-all-wheel-drive-system.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ferrari FF/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 13:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Will review this soon ^^ Arconning (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

• No issues but more of a question, should mentions of the F140 EB be italicized?

  car engine codes are generally italicised (this goes throughout the car community in WP)

History

• work on the shooting brake after the creation of the Pininfarina Sintesi, a concept car., would this be "worked on"?

  that isn’t grammatically correct when you read the sentence

Design and naming

• an airfoil-shaped centre element., would it be aerofoil instead as the article's written in British English?

  done

SP FFX

• No issues here.

Reception

• No issues here.

Media

• Images used in the article are relevant and have proper licensing, love the alt text too!

Refs

• Earwig picks up nothing.
• Random spotchecks: 1, 13, 26, 35, 45, all good.

Misc.

• No ongoing edit war, pretty neutral, broad info about the topic.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• @Arconning: i implemented your suggestions. Thanks for the review! 750h+ 16:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

  I honestly don't have any comments left, the article is amazing! Passing. :) Arconning (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Ferrari FF

• ... that the Ferrari FF (pictured) was, upon its release, the world's fastest four-seating car?

• Source: (accessible via ProQuest), this one’s available as a link, otherwise you can access via ProQuest

• Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by 750h+ (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

750h+ 16:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC).

• Hi, I will be reviewing this momentarily. Before I pull out the checklist, everything looks good on the surface, and the GA passed, which is good. SirMemeGod  15:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for not getting back sooner. The table:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

QPQ:
Overall: No issues, easy pass. SirMemeGod  17:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

References