Talk:Femonationalism

Elaborating on POV tag

My view is that the article isn't neutral in its current state. All of the sources in the article use the term to criticize entities they see as femonationalist. The article should cover what people who are described as femonationalist have to say about their own movements rather than only relying on sources that are anti-femonationalist. What are the arguments in favour of the intersection of feminism and nationalism? Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 22:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Right. The article is pure propaganda and is obviously not interested in a neutral outline of facts. 2A02:1210:3ECB:2600:B9FF:9C9B:8971:ED2B (talk) 03:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps it should be seen more as a proposed concept by academics? After all, those are researcher, not random journalists, and if we don't like what they say isn't a good enough reason. An article about what you propose would be Feminism and nationalism, a different thing. Davide King (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

{{reply to|Chess}}

the term is made by anti-femonationalists to criticize people who they consider to be using feminist rhetoric to be bigoted. there is no need for a section arguing in favor for feminism just as there would be no need to make a section to argue in favor of, say, "pseudointellectualism". this is silly. IntoDaDark (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Pardon me. I meant "in favor of *femonationalism" IntoDaDark (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)