Talk:Female Figure (Giambologna)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Female Figure (Giambologna) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Female Figure (Giambologna) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that 17th-century reformist defenders of Giambologna's 1571–73 sculpture of a woman bathing (pictured) justified her nudity by identifying her as either Bathsheba or Venus?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Female Figure (Giambologna).

Wikipedia

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Identification edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Just a thought, and probably original research, but the ointment jar, emphasis on feet, and nudity suggest to me that this may have been intended to represent the Magdalene. Kafka Liz (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pinging Johnbod for opinion. Kafka Liz (talk) 22:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Could be, but the frilly discarded towel/clothes & jewellery maybe suggest not. Plus she's a bit too nude I think. Nobody seems to have suggested that. Do we really have only one other article on a work by him? Not to mention Italian Renaissance sculpture. Johnbod (talk) 04:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Was just an idle thought. Sculpture isn't really my area, much less that of this period, so I thought I'd ask someone who knew more. :) Kafka Liz (talk) 08:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic