This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
If this article about a flourishing current British record labels gets deleted, then I hope I can look forward to seeing the deletion of this useless article: Amazorblades. They were a no-hope band who produced only one single, now out of print, which was never a hit. It is dignified by lots of Wikilinks, but is of no cultural significance whatsoever. The only reason it gets included is because of the association with the word "punk" - a holy cow to many people, regardless of artistic merit. Ogg13:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Note criterion number 12: "Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network". It qualifies for retention by virtue of the BBC radio broadcast. Ogg14:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's no point in having the entire catalogue here, and every musician who ever recorded for the label, but I'm not going to delete it. Yet. Vmavanti (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
