Talk:Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsourced negative material
editThe following used to be on the article page. Any charges of 'gross systemic issues' ought to be quoted directly from the relevant report, assuming that is what the report said.
Section removed |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
On the other hand, accountability at the administrative level has its challenges. The credibility of the RACP has been recently seriously compromised by consistent public domain reports of discretionary non objective assessments being applied to some medical practitioners. For example, the ongoing Federal Parliamentary Inquiry and the Senate Inquiry which hastily completed in June 2011, continue to reveal gross systemic issues in the Australian method of managing specialist recognition and registration - which is not confined alone to the RACP. Debate will continue whether the Australian colleges (including the RACP) should retain their limited company status or be made accountable to a higher independent body eg Parliament. Till this is achieved, the postnominals will carry limited value internationally outside Australia and New Zealand and their Territories. |
Please don't restore this until the relevant sources can be provided. Moreover, the wording should be made neutral so as not to imply that Wikipedia is taking sides. EdJohnston (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130807110244/http://www.racp.edu.au/page/educational-and-professional-development/training-pathways to http://www.racp.edu.au/page/educational-and-professional-development/training-pathways
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130807171953/http://www.racp.edu.au/page/educational-and-professional-development/prep-basic-training to http://www.racp.edu.au/page/educational-and-professional-development/prep-basic-training
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130807123625/http://www.racp.edu.au/page/educational-and-professional-development/advanced-training to http://www.racp.edu.au/page/educational-and-professional-development/advanced-training
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)