This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Why does this have its own Wiki article? Is there some other article this can be merged to? I just don't see how this concept warrants an article. Torc2 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
scholar.google.com lists 908 scientific articles mentioning Feedback Vertex Set; 88 have it in their title. It would be easy to fill a whole book with the results. So in my opinion, this concepts does warrant an article. --Mellum (talk) 23:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
OK, I was just legitimately curious - I didn't tag it or nominate it for deletion. It'd be nice to flesh out the section on uses for the function. Torc2 (talk) 23:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
This statement was initially sourced Cao, Chen & Liu (2010) harvtxt error: no target: CITEREFCaoChenLiu2010 (help), but is not supported by that reference. Hermel (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article keeps saying that the optimization version (MINIMUM FVS) is NP-complete. It is not. It is NP-hard. It is the decision problem that is NP-complete.
This is probably happening in other articles as well. 68.5.117.23 (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply