Talk:Federalist No. 6/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

• Will do. AryKun (talk) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• "The argument" maybe "This argument"?
• "He also identifies...war-prone nations" Shouldn't the clause after the comma provide a contrast with the first clause here?
  • It doesn't use "but", "however", "although", etc
• "Madison used a similar empiricist argument as Hamilton" maybe better as "Madison used an empiricist argument similar to Hamilton's"
• Plot summary seems accurate from a reading of the original document.
• Images are properly licensed and used.
• References are reliable and properly formatted.
• Spot-checks:
  • "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
  • Millican, Edward (2014). One United People: The Federalist Papers and the National Idea. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 79–80. Verifies all claims made.
  • "Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
• That's all I have.

AryKun, all changes made except the one noted above. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)