Talk:Federalism in Iraq

Merge

This merge request was placed here when the article was just started. I think the information is too detailed to merit including in the main Iraq article. AndrewRT(Talk) 22:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Merge with Federal Government of Iraq

As the author of this article, I dont think that Federalism in Iraq is the same at all as Federal government of Iraq.

Federalism is a political programme which promotes a constitutionally divided responsibilities between a central government and federal units. In the context of unitary states as Iraq used to be, federalism is a programme that seeks to create federal units underneath. This is a current live debate, with plenty of reliable sources with details of the current issues and progress surrounding it. I think it deserves its own article.

The article Federal government of Iraq is a valid article and a welcome and important addition to the encyclopedia. However, it doesn;t cover the same subject and it is inappropriate to go into so much detail about this subject in that article. AndrewRT(Talk) 11:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

As the one who redirected, I have no opinion - someone had placed a prod tag, but noted that the content had been merged. Since articles that have had content merged into other articles shouldn't be deleted, but only redirected, I went ahead and made the redirect. --Reuben (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

No probs Reuban. Hopefully the person who put the prod tag on will engage here. AndrewRT(Talk) 23:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I think a separate article would probably contribute positively to the overall quality of Wikipedia, so by all means proceed. Although the articles are somewhat interdependent, my merge might have been a bit premature. Int21h (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Other initiatives

I notice that the sections on the Basrah initiative and referendum and other mooted proposals have been removed, saying they are now redundant. [1] Given that this is an article about Federalism in Iraq as a concept, I still think it's valid to include information about proposals that have, as yet, been unsuccessful, so I would like to reinstate. I do, of course, accept that they need to be updated and largely re-written. I'd also like to add information about the recent vote in Salaheddin [2].

Rather than just insert it again, I'd like to have a debate about whether it's appropriate. What do you think? AndrewRT(Talk) 15:34, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed this after all these years.. Yes, it is valid, and it is desirable. A history of the proposals is a fundamental insight into the subject. This information should be re-added. Int21h (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Regions

"Regions of Iraq" redirects here. I was expecting to find a list of their names, and a map. -- Beland (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Fixed the redirect. Kmusser (talk) 21:08, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federalism in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=IBO145418&WTmodLoc=World-R5-Alertnet-4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161128152712/http://www.iraqinationality.gov.iq/attach/iraqi_constitution.pdf to http://www.iraqinationality.gov.iq/attach/iraqi_constitution.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)