Talk:Federalism in India

Good work!

This is a great idea for an article. Expansion ideas : 1) 42nd amendment 2)list of 356 dismissals and court cases.

thanks. i didnt realise someone has started the article under a different title. you are right, this, as it works now, is the bedrock of India's national integrity. it has a great potential to become a featured article. sure, we can include the 42nd amendment and the 356 dismissals. In fact, India is practically much more loosely federal than the constitution envisioned. we can include how Indira Gandhi centralised everything during her tenure, how it created friction around the periphery and how the centralisation loosened again over the past years with modern economical changes. --CarTick 14:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 02:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of content

Link to revert

User 01.56.243.170 has deleted on 11 October 2016 important content from the page stating not structural differences. The content is indicating the actual contrasts / situation (more relevant issues) also supported by a reference and also no way controversial. The edit war was initiated by 101.56.243.170 not by me by removing a content personally not liked by him. 183.82.199.109 (talk) 01:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry. All the content there seems like your personal opinion. Can you show us any reliable source that uses words like "highly developed", "low quality" and "substandard". And, what does this any of this have to do with Federalism anyway? Please read the "Five pillars" articles posted on your talk page. -- User:Kautilya3, 09:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

I hope you have forgotten to insert your user name. For substantiating my widely accepted statements, there is no need of giving refs to waste memory bites. Regarding performance of Judiciary already reference is available. However for your satisfaction please find few refs below how union central government and parliament try to dominate / over through judiciary and state governments violating constitution. If you do not like adjectives "highly developed", "low quality" and "substandard" propose changes without compromising on the intent of the content but not delete the total content to your personal beliefs. These valid statements are made for comparing Indian polity and judiciary with that of EU and USA.

India ranks 76 in Corruption Perception Index

National Commission to Review the Working of the Article 356 of the constitution Recently, state governments in Uttarakand and Arunachal Pradesh dismissed violating constitution.

SC declares NJAC unconstitutional, upholds Collegium for influencing over judiciary by union central government. What is the need of ruling part & major opposition party joining together as a rare cooperation and passing the constitutional amendment bill to abolish collegium system

Why a Sitting Judge of the Supreme Court is Fighting to Reform the Collegium Judiciary showing reluctance for transparency in its procedures.183.82.199.109 (talk) 10:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Problem at end

Good comparison of countries, but the ending seems to be an Indian slide in the American section Dogblock (talk) 01:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)