Talk:Fateh-110

Supply to Hezbollah

I think this supply to Hezbollah thing needs citation. I don't think Iran would do that. Such accusations should be based on firm documents. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.99.207.231 (talk) 04:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Fateh 110.jpg

Image:Fateh 110.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Fateh-110. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://swap.stanford.edu/20120913112146/http%3A//english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn%3D9104254711 to http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9104254711
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007053615/http://english.farsnews.net/newstext.php?nn=8906031433 to http://english.farsnews.net/newstext.php?nn=8906031433
• Added archive https://swap.stanford.edu/20120813030611/http%3A//english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn%3D9104252685 to http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9104252685
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429081803/http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8911181179 to http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8911181179
• Added archive https://swap.stanford.edu/20120813030611/http%3A//english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn%3D9104252685 to http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9104252685

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

BM-120

BM-120 is export version of the Fath, not a smaller Fateh-110 IdkIdc12345 (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

I added an unreliable sources tag. I found statements made in Wikivoice that were cited to Iranian state media, including FARS, a "news" agency owned by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. These are definitely not reliable sources and shouldn't be used per WP:RS.

I've removed some of them that I've found and replaced them with reliable sources (see the reliable source list) like CNN and some that aren't on there but are definitely reliable for this (Center for Strategic and International Studies report for example, used with attribution).

I'll be removing the tag once I've had time to finish going through the article and remove all of the unreliable sources. Also had some basic grammar issues I've tried to fix. Chuckstablers (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)