Talk:Far-right terrorism in Spain

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Far-right terrorism in Spain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423131353/http://www.covite.org/covite_articulos.php?lang=es to http://www.covite.org/covite_articulos.php?lang=es&idNoticia=448&idSeccion=3&idOrigen=2
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130411122311/http://www.noticiasdegipuzkoa.com/2010/05/05/opinion/tribuna-abierta/30-aniversario-del-asesinato-de-maria-jose-bravo-del-barrio to http://www.noticiasdegipuzkoa.com/2010/05/05/opinion/tribuna-abierta/30-aniversario-del-asesinato-de-maria-jose-bravo-del-barrio

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

wrong information

Write about VOX and include it in the "far-right" is absolutely fake and a lack of real information

I have reverted this change for the following reasons:

• • Editor has not substantiated their claim with sources. Simply stating is it fake is not enough.
  • Content removed is sourced
  • The main article, Vox (political party), has 4 sources stating VOX is far-right.

Editor: Please state your reasons clearly with sources to back up your reasoning. I think there might be room for comprise here but you must gain consensus with the broader community. S0091 (talk) 23:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

The unsigned editor above appears to be Campurrianan, probably the same IP editor who has disrupted before. Probably time to report to the admins. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

I see that there's some updated info on the Vox page though (about winning seats in later elections), which could be incorporated here and the paragraph compressed a bit. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Following up here about the more general issue about the inclusion of mention of Vox in the article, responding to EdJohnston. The recent problem arose because of Campurrianan's repeated reversions of S0091's edits, and assertions that Vox is not a far-right party, contrary to numerous sources and the Vox page itself, and insistence on repeatedly reverting edits instead of discussing here. I cannot now recall what led me to add mention of it in the article, particularly as one of the articles cited is now inaccessible to me. A quick google brings me an article which mentions links to terrorist organisations (although I see in the main article that in April 2019 they forced the resignation of some of the Nazis); or it may have been a general fear that the kind of rhetoric they use encourages nutters on the fringes to commit acts of terrorism. Either way, I don't care enough to argue for its inclusion! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)