Talk:Fantôme Brewery

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Well written, but unencyclopedic

edit

This article reads more like a (well written) beer label than an encyclopedia article, and needs to be edited for tone. While true, assertions relating to the popularity of this brewery need citations. - superβεεcat  18:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Added some more citations based on the documentation available online - newspaper and magazine articles, etc. Removed the citations tag based on that. Included references stating the popularity of the brewery outside of Belgium per the request. If you have a more specific concern, vis-a-vis sources, please state it and let's try to address.Shorn again (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've just tagged this for tone - hadn't realised it had been previously tagged. Appreciate that there's been an attempt to clean up, but langauge is rather flowery - needs to be rather more neutral and sober so that a reader can trust what is being said. SilkTork *YES! 00:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fantôme Brewery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply