 | A fact from Fangyi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 April 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
( )
.jpg)
Fangyi dated to the 12th century BCE (Shang dynasty)
- ... that bronze fangyi vessels (pictured) are thought to have been used for food or wine offerings to ancestors in Bronze Age China? Source: Fleming, John; Honour, Hugh (1979). The Penguin Dictionary of Decorative Arts. Viking. p. 300.
Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 15:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC).
@Prioryman: Interesting subject matter. Article is new enough, long enough, mostly referenced to RS and hook is cited. QPQ has been satisfied. The first paragraph, which in this case is not solely a summary of the article, lacks a citation though. Once this is fixed, nomination is good to go. Al Ameer (talk) 03:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Prioryman. I’m no expert in our image policies—it appears from the Commons page that the hook image could be used—but I noticed on the Flickr page it says “All Rights Reserved”. Which is it? —Al Ameer (talk) 00:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Al Ameer son, that's not a problem – it's specicially addressed at the bottom of the original pic's page on Commons, where it says: "When this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, it was available from Flickr under the stated license. The Flickr user has since stopped distributing the file under this license. As Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked in this manner, the file is still free to use under the terms of the license specified." So it's still good to use. Prioryman (talk) 12:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
