Talk:Faith-based marketing

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

(This page is not advertising anything, and there are several scholarly journals on the subject. It is an emerging field, and there is ongoing research on the topic. The page will continue to be edited and new sources will be added. Additionally, it is not a vanity page.) (3NMAngels (talk) 20:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)) ==Reply

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Thank you for your comments, however there is not one single item that is being promoted or advertised in any way on this page. Faith-Based Marketing is big business, and I am neither for it or against it, I am striving to state only factual information. I do realize that there are a few items that may sound biased, but I have sought to correct these.) --3NMAngels (talk) 03:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I did not place the speedy deletion tag originally but I have removed it, since I think it is a reasonable article. It still needs some help however. Harej (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

There were some neutrality issues, and I've given a good faith (heh) effort to make the article more neutral, and removed the relevant tags as a result. --j⚛e decker ^talk 21:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic