Talk:Fairmile B motor launch
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fairmile B motor launch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fairmile B motor launch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926142319/http://www.navy.gov.au/Publication%3ANavy_Contribution_to_Australian_Maritime_Operations to http://www.navy.gov.au/Publication%3ANavy_Contribution_to_Australian_Maritime_Operations
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Added Main Page to Canadian Fairmile B Motor Launch edit
Created new page for the Canadian Fairmile. Added Main Page link under Commonwealth Fairmiles HamOnt (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
"based on the lines of a destroyer" edit
Is this really true? What's the source for this - is it a primary source (for example, Holt's drawings)? The Type B Motor Launch had a length to beam ratio of about 1:6, not the 1:10 of a destroyer, and it was flush-decked with a noticeable camber on the main deck, whilst British destroyers had been of raised forecastle type since the River class nearly forty years earlier - and would continue to be until the advent of the Guided Missile Destroyer. So, what's the factual basis for this very bold statement? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:1932:BE89:78F2:E2D (talk) 12:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
ML 303 is shown with a forward 3-pdr, amidships Oerlikon and a 40mm AA type aft. Article states that navigation launches (as 303 had been redesignated and outfitted for in June 1944) carried a 40mm Bofors in the aft position.
However, the photograph does not clearly support this statement. Looking closely, the gun mounting is of the same 'layered' cylindrical type as found on the Mk V 20mm and Mk XVI 2-pdr hydraulically powered mountings, the gun axis height is identical to that of the 2-pdr Mk XVI (overlaying photographs of mounting on Type Ds in late-war guise with same gun mounted aft matches up) and the proportional relationship of the 2-pdr receiver and barrel jacket / muzzle assembly likewise matches, whereas the Bofors shows different proportions.
In short, this boat seems to be carrying a pom-pom and not a Bofors gun, contrary to what the article says. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:F072:7BA7:2EB9:D1CB (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)