Talk:Faile (artist collective)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 98.234.95.213 in topic Career section is extremely un-encyclopedic
 | Faile (artist collective) was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Career section is extremely un-encyclopedic
editThe career section should likely be reduced to 10% of its current length, and cleaned up significantly to be something resembling encyclopedic. It is currently a gushing word salad of art critique, not encyclopedic information. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Intro reads like an advertisement
editI have replaced the advert template, as the introduction is gushing, subjective, and very clearly written like an advertisement. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
GA fail
editI have failed this article, mostly because of several issues with references:
- Reliability and problems
- I am not entirely sure if these references are to be trusted, they seem to be unreliable; one of the html links doesn't seem to be functional, another doesn't seem to atcually give any information... the problems go on
- Number
- There are only 5 references, and, as pointed out above, many are corrupted in their html format, unreliable, and non-informative.
- Unsourced claims
- ...pepper the article. Get some references for these claims. I will attempt to put {{fact}} tags on the statements that need references especially.
Good luck in your improvements to the article. If there are any questions, they should be directed to my talk page. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please note also that a general cleanup of prose and the article in general would certainly not go amiss. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)