Talk:Fail-fast system
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Wbm1058 in topic Requested move 18 November 2023
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Requested move 18 November 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Fail-fast system. – wbm1058 (talk) 13:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Fail-fast → Fail-fast (information technology) – There is a very similarly named page Fail fast that is about business, which is confusing. I propose renaming that page too Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 09:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. — mw (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- The current title appears to be an adjective. Per WP:NOUN, Fail-fast system (information technology) or Fail-fast system might be a better title. Dekimasuよ! 12:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Move to Fail-fast system per Dekimasu. This appears to fall within systems engineering. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- In addition to being more clearly a noun and indicating the context, "Fail-fast system" would provide WP:NATURAL disambiguation. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Got here from the other article -- I think fail-fast system is a better choice here. Both terms are used within the tech industry, so (business) vs (information technology) may not be of much help. Valereee (talk) 09:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Either could have a hyphen. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support per the other discussion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: Clear consensus to move, but no consensus for "system" vs "(information technology)". — mw (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: No comments since the last relisting. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think fail-fast system is preferable for the natural disambiguation. BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support move to Fail-fast system per WP:NATDIS, WP:NOUN Wracking talk! 21:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.