Talk:Fader Bergström/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this one today! --K. Peake 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
  • Thanks.
• Remove the best-known and best-loved songs part, as that is not sourced
  • Done.
• Add a sentence ending the lead about the reception/legacy of the composition
  • Done.

Context

• Good
  • Thanks.

Song

Music and verse form

• Add relevant text to the audio sample to justify usage
  • Added.
• Pipe 3/4 time to Triple metre
  • Done.

Lyrics

• Pipe Fredman to Jean Fredman
  • Done.

Reception

• Retitle to Reception and legacy
  • Done.
• "before the Chancellor of Justice. Fortunately" → "before the Chancellor of Justice and fortunately,"

^* Done.

• Are you sure unbridled is an appropriate term here?
  • Said 'unrestrained' instead. Means the same thing.
• Pipe street-girls to Prostitution
  • Done.
• Add the release year of Glimmande nymf
  • Added.
• Imgs look good!!
  • Thanks.

References

• Copyvio score looks quite good at 31.5%!
  • Noted.
• Should ref 13 be cited in place of ref 8 since it includes p. 149?
  • Merged refs.
• Remove or replace ref 16 per WP:RSPYT
  • Removed.

Sources

• Wikilink as Albert Bonniers Förlag instead
  • Done.

External links

• Good
  • Thanks.

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 07:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Done all those, thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

• Chiswick Chap Nice work on this, but you still need to fix the Chanceller prose in reception since those sentences are too short to be on their own. --K. Peake 20:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, thanks for fixing everything so quickly! --K. Peake 07:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)