Requested move

edit

I have requested that the name of this article be changed from "Fish processing vessel" to the more usual "Factory ship". --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:04, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Should "overfishing" be in here as a subsection?

edit

Should "overfishing" be in here as a subsection? Or should it just be a link to a different topic? -- Kschang77 (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think the section certainly belongs here. If it is not controlled carefully, heavy industrial-scale fishing by factory ships can easily result in serious overfishing. However, the section could be rewritten to keep a better focus on how factory ships relate to overfishing. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I disagree. This seems like an attempt to blacken commercial fishing generally. Moreover, the page is about factory ships, not fishing practises, so it's misplaced at best. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 11:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Where she blows?

edit

They're not common anymore, but surely mention of whale factory ships is appropriate? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 11:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Factory ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Factory ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Factory ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Overfishing section not very relevant the topic of the article

edit

The section titled "Overfishing" is lacking relevance to the article. It talks about overfishing in general, but it's content is not very relevant to factory ships. The section should be rewritten to be relevant to factory ships (e.g. it could focus on how factory ships facilitate overfishing), or it should be removed. -Ireadandcheck (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply