Talk:Face 2 Face (Juice Wrld song)

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Wpscatter in topic Requested move 3 July 2023

Requested move 3 July 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Editors felt the "2" stylization does not sufficiently disambiguate between other songs titled "Face to Face". (non-admin closure) WPscatter t/c 16:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


Face 2 Face (Juice Wrld song)Face 2 Face (song) – This should be moved to this because this is the only song article with the name Face 2 Face. It was previously already moved to this through this move request system, but the move was wrongfully reverted for not using the system, which was not true. I also came here yesterday with this, but I did not reply soon enough, so it was likely deleted for that reason, but this is one of the first requests, so it should work this time. This is an easy case. Please also make sure to edit it to the new name in the templates of the artists after you move the article. 70.113.0.198 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). UtherSRG (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Songs has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – "2" is just a stylization which does not sufficiently disambiguate this one from the numerous ones listed at Face to Face (song) (currently ten songs having an article and six more without it, plus two dozen albums). I do not think it is sufficiently notable to "earn" the PARTIALDAB exemption just because of the titling gimmick. No such user (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – "2" is just a stylization and hiding the name of artist not helpful to readers. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.