Talk:Fabio Innocenti

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Actualcpscm in topic Protection

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fabio Innocenti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.β€”InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because even if it is not relevant, that is not csd, it is afd.--𝕸𝖗 π•½π–Šπ–†π–‰π–Žπ–“π–Œ π•Ώπ–šπ–—π–™π–‘π–Š|πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦|☎️|πŸ“„ 01:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Courtesy ping@FI369: 𝕸𝖗 π•½π–Šπ–†π–‰π–Žπ–“π–Œ π•Ώπ–šπ–—π–™π–‘π–Š|πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦|☎️|πŸ“„ 01:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Article for deletion edit

This biography article is missing information to show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria. The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth. Additionally, the article lacks coverage about Early life, Career, Personal life, Achievements and honours (if any). Please help this article by adding needed content. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Protection edit

At this AfD discussion, it was suggested that the article be semi-protected, but no consensus developed for this in the discussion. My two cents on that question: Protection should not be preemptive, so I would suggest waiting to see if this page becomes the target of disruption again or if this was an isolated incident. Anyway, if the AfD consensus had included protection, I wouldnβ€˜t have closed that discussion (WP:NACD).Actualcpscm (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply