Talk:Fabian Cancellara/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MadGeographer (talk · contribs) 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This is a very good (and detailed) article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   Appropriate use with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I think you've done a great job here! Note: this is my first GA review, so in case I missed something, additional comments are welcome (although I really don't see anything now that could prevent this article from being listed at GA). mgeo talk 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

yeah your first ork. and if there are any questions, just write to presse(at)infrontringier.ch . this article is ridiculous. cancelara is obvious part of...ahwww ya know what. i go to sleep. at last - he´ll be armstronged. if not, he´ll pantani himself :D. bye 217.191.51.229 (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)