 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quick skim edit
Well a quick read and i can see two things that jump out. There are no references to back any of the text up and the lead is rather short. Simply south (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't write the lead, but I will try to add something later... the same thing goes for the references. For now, if possible, please read the rest of the article and tell me if I did some mistake in the translations... as English is not my first language. Thank you! -PanozzoFetuso (talk) 23:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have fixed some of the translation although not being an expert on the technical stuff i don't know quite about that. Simply south (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, in the meantime, i have added some references; i plan to expand the lead and/or something else as soon as possible. Bye! -PanozzoFetuso (talk) 23:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Reassessed to C class for the same concerns that were listed above. There is quite a bit of good information here, but there are no footnotes within the article text, there are only three references listed at the end (for a locomotive class that was as widely used as the lead implies, there should be many more references that we can point to here) and the lead section is too short for an article of this length. The general B-Class criteria can be used as a guideline for improvement here. Slambo (Speak) 18:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've made some changes to the text. About the references: they mostly are inside the paper documentation I've already listed while for some other things is... just my knowledge (especially the technical parts). However, most of what I've written can also be found on www.e636.it so I think I should add it to the reference list. Let me know. -PanozzoFetuso (talk) 00:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)