Talk:FN Five-seven/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by ROG5728 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Nicely done. Very complete
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- What do the different colors on the tips of the bullets mean?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
editThe 5.7x28mm cartridges are color coded for easy identification. The color codes and differences between the cartridges are explained in greater detail in the 5.7x28mm article, but it probably wouldn't be appropriate to expand on that information in the gun's article. ROG5728 (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- True, but an expansion of the caption wouldn't be out of line if you can keep it short, because I'm not the only guy who's going to have that question.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- I went back and expanded the caption with some extra information. ROG5728 (talk) 07:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Good enough.
- I went back and expanded the caption with some extra information. ROG5728 (talk) 07:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)