Talk:F. Hinds

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

I've just tagged the article for complete lack of references, which is obviously justified. I've also tagged it for notability, in the hope this will prompt somebody to establish its notability: it seems likely to me that a company of this prominence is notable, but I've not been able to find any suitable references. I think that this is just because I don't know what to look for: all my searches have been full of ads, promotions and directories. --ColinFine (talk) 07:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Plenty of refs now, and enough detail to be more than a stub. Some pictures would be nice. --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 21:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on F. Hinds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply