Talk:Eyes Without a Face (film)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Natg 19 in topic Requested move 3 May 2022
Good articleEyes Without a Face (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Eyes-without-faceposter.jpg edit

 

Image:Eyes-without-faceposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Talk:Eyes Without a Face/GA1Reply

Allmovie edit

Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Suggested "influences" edit

I'm highly critical of this sentence in the introduction: "as well as being a notable influence on filmmakers such as John Carpenter, Jesús Franco and John Woo." for being too speculative. a) Carpenter only suggests in the quoted interview that LYSV (or the mask in it, respectively) could have influenced the mask used in his film Halloween. b) Again, reviews suggest that the operation scene in LYSV influenced the same scene in Face/Off. Woo never confirmed that to my knowledge. I would leave these passages in the Legacy section of this article but would change the mentioned sentence in the intro to something like "as well as being an influence on other filmmakers." or simply delete it from the intro.--Robert Kerber (talk) 16:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Right. This was my first article I really worked on and looking at it again, these should be removed. I can't find a source on Woo stating this directly so I'm going to go with what you suggested. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:58, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Genre edit

LYSV is not a genuine horror film (as written in the intro) but a combination of thriller and horror or rather a thriller with horror elements (visuals, mad scientist motif). There is absolutely no supernatural element to it. William Everson doesn't even mention it in his "Classics of the horror film".--Robert Kerber (talk) 16:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Horror films don't necessarily need a supernatural element. Allrovi, Criterion, J. Hoberman, and Pauline Kael refer to it as a horror film, I believe that's enough sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I question Allrovi as a profound source and Criterion is simply the DVD's distribution company; of course the latter two are viewpoints worth discussing. It still reminds me of the popular misconception of Hitchcock's Psycho being a horror film. (I hope we agree on that.) Btw, what's your opinion on the topic "Suggested influences" (above)?--Robert Kerber (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I could find more, but I think Kael and Hoberman cover it for now. But that's five sources Wikipedia would accept in referring to it as a horror film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Co-production with Italy?... edit

The article used to call Eyes Without a Face a French-Italian film. After looking in the page's "Production" section for a connection to Italy, I found nothing, so I researched further. From what I can gather, the film is considered French-Italian by two sources—the Internet Movie Database (which is considered questionable as a citation), and an article on the website PopMatters (the article can be found here, and I suspect that it took the notion of the film being a French-Italian co-production from the article's lede sentence).

No other sources seem to consider the film to be Italian. The film's entry on the Criterion Collection's website lists a sole country of origin: France. A similar mention of France and not Italy can be found in this article by The Guardian. Nothing really seems to indicate that Italy was heavily involved with the film. –Matthew - (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Understood, but all the readings (and even the posters credits itself as a French-Italian production). Pulling information from Bifi.fr, a site that takes its information from the Cinémathèque Française claims its both a French and Italian co-production, specifically noting Lux as an Italian company based in Rome. Usually, Criterion is pretty accurate, but I'd rather see some specific writing stating how Italy was not involved outside this research. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I didn't notice that the poster says Co-production Franco-Italienne in some small writing in the bottom corner. You're quite right; my apologies. –Matthew - (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
No worries! Its good to back up things on posters anyways.:) Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:58, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Eyes Without a Face. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 3 May 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Created dab page at base name. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


Eyes Without a FaceEyes Without a Face (film) – There seems to be WP:NOPRIMARY between the film and the song in terms of pageviews. While the song's name is based on the film, at this point both can lay claim to having some longterm significance culturally, so it's not a clear case of something having been so long established that it is far and away the main cultural influence. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 08:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 晚安 (トークページ) 16:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • The song is named after the film and the film gets more views (5,950) than the song (3,531)[[1]] but there are 2 unrelated (it seems) episodes. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Note that the film is in the main namespace so there are likely to be false positive hits from people looking for the song. It's still likely the film gets more views but not at a ludicrous ratio, plus the song itself is culturally well known, having been a top-10 hit. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 20:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Colin M (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support"' per nom. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.