Talk:Extra Large Medium

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleExtra Large Medium has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 17, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Sarah Palin photo

edit

I don't think the Palin photo is right for that section. If this section is about her being mad about this episode, why is she SMILING? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.108.194 (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't matter. Gage (talk) 07:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Because all the free picture of her depict her smiling to the crowd. If you want the section to feature an image of her mad then go to one of her public appearances and snap a picture of her slaming one of her apossers and add it here. My question was why was the photo switched with the one I originaly added? Sarujo (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possible "Around the World" Reference

edit

Something I noticed while watching the episode was that during the "Starlight Express" reference, Peter repeats the same phrase over-and-over while moving around a circle with a ramp. This is somewhat similar to the song and music video for Around the World (Daft Punk song). Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.49.144 (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Everything added needs a reliable source to be added so it isn't OR CTJF83 GoUSA 21:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Extra Large Medium/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 23:46, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I am reviewing this article and have made a few minor copy edits. Please feel free to correct any errors I may have introduced. This article passes GA.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    I corrected a few minor wording and punctuation issues.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Article is well sourced. I see no original research.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    The article remains focused on the subject but covers the relevant areas.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall: A wonderful, concise article
    Pass/Fail:  

Congratulations! I enjoyed reading the article. Xtzou (Talk) 23:46, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Extra Large Medium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extra Large Medium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extra Large Medium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Extra Large Medium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply