Talk:Exposé (Lost)/GA1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    In the Plot, "Paulo poisons his food, and the couple steals his diamonds, which are worth $8 million", I hope your referring to Paulo and Nikki, if so, it would be best to add that little detail, especially for the people who read this article.
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
    In the lead, it would be best to add (ABC) after "American Broadcasting Company".
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    Publisher is needed for Reference 1 and 4. Also, it would be best if the references use the {{cite web}} format.
    Half-check. Reference 4 is still missing Publisher info. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
    Fixed--Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 02:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):  
    In the Production section, is there a source for this ---> "Exposé" was the fourteenth episode of the series directed by Stephen Williams. The episode was written by Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz, the pair had previously written eight other episodes of Lost?
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed problems mentioned. --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 15:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you to Mr.crabby for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply