Talk:Expedia Group
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 6, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | A fact from Expedia Group appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 612 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Advertisement Warning? edit
Looks like my edits triggered the maintenance template and is showing a warning on promotional content. Any ideas specifically what might be triggering this? The main copy that I updated was up top. For now, I can revert back to the original (but keeping the name change since they did officially announce that) and then try to figure out what is setting it off. Any help and/or suggestions are most welcome! JustinDeco (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- I just removed the current advert warning tag, which was dated August 2018. I don't see anything in the current article that warrants it. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Modifications? edit
This page has been altered heavily and poorly. I uses this page in Novemeber and it had much more information and did not have the ill-placed black sections or redundant paragraphs.
24.170.141.107 (talk) 04:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Not only that, but almost the entire paragraph under the Accolades section should be removed, as it sounds like someone who had a bad experience with Expedia decided to voice their complaint here. Here is the text that I vote should be removed:
"However, the company still has a ways to go. Even trip planning specialist and managers at the company don't seem to have much knowledge about flight details and trip planning. Also, if dealing with Expedia, make sure that they match up your flights or the resulting faulty itinerary may cause problems at the airport that may force you to cancel a well deserved vacation or important trip. The company also tends to not be very responsible when it comes to admitting problems in their planning or itinerary, so don't expect any sort of refund or deal if they do cause you to have to cancel your trip."
- Dave Slinn 10:21 ET 21 September 2009
The last paragraph of accolades: In what year? This sentence sounds bizarre "Expedia Inc. Named One of “America’s Best Managed Companies” by Forbes — Forbes’ list of the 400 best managed, public American companies with $1 billion or more in revenues includes Expedia for the first time." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.148.15.106 (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Does this entire "accolades" thing belong in wikipedia? What is this, NPR? Maybe if there were equal time for the "complaints"...but really, wikipedia is not the place for this gibberish. This entire page is like some giant can of junk created by a mid level PR flack. Rickbolger (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Expedia.com edit
What is expedia.com? is it a subsidiary of Expedia, Inc.? I'm a little bit confused about the assignment as product inside the article. I think that product is also not absolut correct. -- Raubsaurier (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Expedia (website) Is a company, that is owned by Expedia In, the parent company.
pure speculation re google edit
The article states
Initially, it was widely speculated that Google wanted to occupy most of the building, but a crane accident in 2006 caused delay and Google backed out of the project.
With the this seattlepi as a reference. HOWEVER, the article explicitly states it's pure speculation.
One prospective tenant was Google, which was seriously looking at taking most of the space in the building last summer. The collapse of a construction crane at Tower 333 in November, which killed a man in a nearby building and delayed the project, may have caused Google to look elsewhere.
How did "MAY HAVE CAUSED" turned into "CAUSED" in article.
Note that this is actually NOT the real reason (neither the accident nor the delay) they did not take the space AT ALL. So this is nonsense altogether. --64.134.146.167 (talk) 01:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Draft for CEO Mark Okerstrom edit
Hi, my name is Victoria and I am a representative of Expedia Group. I am a paid employee of the company and therefore have a financial conflict of interest. I've submitted a new article for Expedia Group's CEO, Mark Okerstrom and it was declined. I am surprised since I was careful to properly cite all statements in the draft with quality sourcing. Are there any editors interested in this topic that would please take a look at my draft submission here and offer feedback? Thanks in advance! Victoria at ExpediaGroup (talk) 19:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Nameste edit
We wants to do collection with your organization so can I get the number of key peson or tour poeator ? If you have any suggestion or code and conduct, pls provide us. 2400:1A00:B040:832D:9056:8D55:C550:297D (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)