Talk:Exotic Gothic

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exotic Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal of plot material

edit

I've removed the long summaries of the tables of contents of each edition of this series and replaced them with a more appropriate summary of the editions. I did this primarily for WP:PLOT, which tells us that we only need summary desciprtions. Further, the summaries included few actual facts other than the Tables of contents of the editions; the references weren't at all meaningful and were instead references to previous publications of the individual works. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

**Decowen has a valid point. While Mikeblas may have detected problems in some of the details, the recent deletion of 45,545 characters that follow the entry’s third sentence appears to be vandalism and should be reverted. While "removed plot summaries" is cited in the edit history, there seem to be no plot summaries or story plots in the article before. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page, rather than highlight all matter post-third sentence and then click delete. Rather than nuanced editing, this is random chopping. The problem here is that all of the editors who have contributed reasons for this series’ notability (including its famed contributors like Neil Gaiman and Joyce Carol Oates; key awards in speculative fiction like the World Fantasy Award and the Shirley Jackson Award) have had their citations removed, and the article shrunk to a stub. 

If the tone is biased, selectively highlight lines for deletion. If the sources are unhelpful, please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. 216.7.225.78 (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gutting of Page

edit

This article has been reduced from a detailed piece relating to an award winning anthology series to nothing more than a publishing blurb. If edits of this nature are considered acceptable then Wikipedia is simply a bland bibiliography.

The authors contributing to the series are award winning authors from around the globe. That is what made this series so exceptional. The removal of virtually all text other than the barest of publication details should not be allowed to stand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decowen (talkcontribs) 22:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Decowen: I agree, I have undone the removal: there is plenty of room for trimming in this version, but a complete removal is excessive. Sadads (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
There is a lot of overblown or overemphasized information, that I am in the process of trimming. However, there are also a number of things that can be kept, so I am going to help remaster these hopefully. Sadads (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Exotic Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Exotic Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply