Talk:Exolum Pipeline System

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Energy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

removed bit edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The GPSS is run to This task includes the maximum development of private sector usage of the GPSS, provided this does not impinge upon its primary purpose of supplying the required fuel for defence purposes and does not require capital investment from public funds.

I'm sure this would make sense, but a bit is missing. Rich Farmbrough 22:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Claimed Night-time Construction of Wartime Pipelines edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In both this entry and the one for ‘Operation PLUTO’ it is claimed that the wartime GPSS pipelines were only constructed at night-time, although in neither case was any evidence provided. I have removed this claim for the following reasons. 1. There is no mention of this in the primary sources for the construction of the GPSS such as the Official History, A.L.Adams paper (Adams was involved as an engineer in the construction of the GPSS) and ‘Petroleum at War’. There is also pictorial evidence in ‘Petroleum at War’ of pipelines being constructed in daylight. Additionally there is no mention of wartime night-time construction of GPSS pipelines in the book ’Fuelling the Wars’. This book, already referenced is, as far as I am aware, the only book written on the history of the GPSS. 2. Whether or not a pipeline was constructed during day or night, its route would be very obvious from the air. However, given that the pipelines were buried with 1.2 to 1,5 metres of soil above them, they would have been extremely difficult to damage by bombing. A rail line would be a far more inviting target and more oil was transported by rail than by pipeline during the war. 3. The construction of the first pipeline was not started until 1941, after the Luftwaffe had lost the Battle of Britain. Workmen constructing the pipeline would have made no more inviting target than thousands of others all over Britain during the War. 4. As a Chartered Engineer with over 30 years experience of working on pipelines, trying to construct a pipeline at night would have been totally impracticable. During the winter of 1938/39 construction of protected storage depots did continue at night but floodlighting was brought in to enable this to happen. Timofacleah (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic