Talk:Exclusive dealing
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Baneonplane in topic Odd and Arbitrary Ordering of Sections, Excessive Detail
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
The reference to 'Restrictive Trade Practices Act' is not in a recognised form. Needs formal legal citation, including jurisdiction.
- Indeed. Which country does that refer to? Remember that Wikipedia is directed at a worldwide audience and as such the jurisdiction of any laws mentioned should be made clear. Rafy 08:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Grammar edit
Several grammar errors in the opening section. Drscar18 (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Odd and Arbitrary Ordering of Sections, Excessive Detail edit
The sections of the page have no coherent order to them. An example is "Third Line Forcing". The description of Australian law doesn't include anything about it, but the one for EU law does. But then the section "Case Illustrating Third Line Forcing" right below it is a case from an Australian court.
There are also several cases that go into excessive depth. Baneonplane (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)