Talk:Ewald's sphere
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Schenad in topic Is the figure right?
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled edit
This stub and the stub on the Ewald construction seem to be about essentially the same thing. I propose that they should be mergedYadevol 13:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ewald's sphere/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| This page (stub) contains inaccuracies and is hard to understand, even for a professional crystallographer. the most glaring mistake is that the radius of the sphere is 1/lambda NOT 2pi/lambda.
see IUCr for better discription http://reference.iucr.org/dictionary/Ewald_sphere |
Last edited at 11:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Is the figure right? edit
The figure of Ewald construction is quite confusing, at least for me as a beginner. None of my text book is drawn like that. Schenad (talk) 11:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)