Talk:Evolutionary ecology
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Evolutionary ecology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trevor7909. Peer reviewers: Calebszy.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Reillymcarr. Peer reviewers: Jtmitchell2.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
another dimension needed edit
Needs to connect with ecological genetics, polymorphism (biology) and other technical topics. Needs to get a grip on what aspects of evolutionary theory are really central to ecology. Needs to weave in faunas, biomes and other overview concepts. Is niche not worth a thought? An appreciation of what many crossover researchers such as E.B. Ford and W.D. Hamilton contributed is missing. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
could some biologists chip in at the talk page regarding the current status of this theory?·Maunus·ƛ· 12:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Ecology Course Peer Review edit
Overall I think that a lot of good things are present within your article. There are a few areas that could be added/edited. When talking about each evolutionary model, I would start each paragraph with the specific method and bold or underline it (I think you can link it to the article with the method for more detail). The area that mentions all the notable people is very good. I think there are many more areas of evolutionary ecology that could be expanded on such as genetics, studies etc. I also think specific examples would be beneficial to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calebszy (talk • contribs) 15:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Update, the changes and additions look great compared to earlier editions. I think it's high quality and a very strogn article now!Calebszy (talk) 16:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Calebszy
Odd Structure: Listing of People edit
It's a bit weird to have a miscellaneous list of people who are evolutionary ecologists. I don't think this follows what I perceive to be a standard Wikipedia format for a topical article. The omission of many persons associated with this broad field is sure to be a problem. For example, why is Alfred Russell Wallace not listed? Arguably, he is more deserving of inclusion that Darwin, and fairly likely anyone else listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300A:519:8F00:B17D:B329:DB2A:BC51 (talk) 23:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)