Talk:Evil Ernie

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 99.6.4.126 in topic Megadeath
edit

I don't wish to get into a revert war over what is, in my opinion, likely a misunderstanding. I had reverted the article in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright problems due to the fact that a large portion of the article is directly lifted from Chaos! Comics' website. Reverting again. Please remember the content that is being removed is in violation of copyright. --Scandalous 19:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

edit

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Megadeath

edit

I am surprised that no one, but me, has ever questioned that the character strangely looks like the cartooned character of the band Megadeath? 99.6.4.126 (talk) 02:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Evil Ernie/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

While it has a few presentation snags, the current page is quite informative (but may well miss some important points), hence the A rating I just gave it. Luis Dantas 09:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've revised the grading to B. Main reasons for this are as follows:

  • Lack of 'real world' information - it covers the fictional character biography and powers, but there's no publication history section (the 'Notes' section mentions how Evil Ernie was affected when Lady Death was sold to another company, affecting his backstory... but that's the only info)
  • Lack of references / issue numbers etc.
  • Not in the preferred WP:CMC/X layout.
Currently, I think it's also towards the lower end of the B grade - I'm afraid it'll need quite a bit of work to raise this to an A standard article. --Mrph 10:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 10:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)