As it stands, this could be folded into the author page edit

It sold well, so it can be considered notable on those terms, but if there's nothing more to say about it, other than that it sold well (while helpfully providing a list of chapter titles) this hardly justifies a stand-alone page on Wikipedia.

I'm an inclusionist and to my eye this is clearly not over the fairly low bar I generally advocate.

Please, some other inclusionist find something to add to help get this over the bar, because I view almost every reverse parental-merge as a failure to thrive. — MaxEnt 18:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply