Talk:Evaluation measures (information retrieval)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evaluation measures (information retrieval). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120074515/http://pascallin.ecs.soton.ac.uk/challenges/VOC/pubs/everingham10.pdf to http://pascallin.ecs.soton.ac.uk/challenges/VOC/pubs/everingham10.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate

I think Relevance (information_retrieval) duplicate this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamamz3 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed changes to transcluded formula template

Fellow Wikipedians: I've proposed some changes to the formula infobox transcluded into this article, with the goal of trimming down its overpowering (if not excessive) width. My original message with some explanatory notes is at Template talk:Confusion matrix terms#Template_width, and you can see the revised template layout I've proposed by viewing its sandbox version.

There have been no responses over there in well over two months, and since the changes I'm proposing are significant enough to possibly be contentious, I wanted to invite any interested Wikipedians to discuss them over at the template's talk page. Thanks! FeRDNYC (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi FeRDNYC, I have removed this template as it is on the Confusion matrix page and doesn't seem relevant to this topic. As you say it is also way too big. I am working with some computer scientists interested in improving this page and updating the information to include more current methods. Amanda Lawrence 04:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)