Talk:European Union Association Agreement

Merger?

mergeto|Stabilisation and Association Process|discuss=Talk:Stabilisation and Association Process#Merger?|date=December 2008

Stabilisation and Association process (suggestion to Wgeelhoed)

Wgeelhoed, you're right. How about: "The Stabilisation and Association process covers official candidates Croatia, Macedonia and Montenegro, applicants Albania and Serbia, and potential candidates Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo"? CostaDax (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I changed the text accordingly. It certainly is clearer having a middel category of countries having submitted an application. Wgeelhoed 14:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wgeelhoed (talk • contribs)

Great! I will only add a comma after Serbia to make the distinction clearer and to be precise in the correct usage of punctuation. CostaDax (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Kindly stop giving wrong facts If you do noyt know your fact kindly stop posting them on wikipedia. Article 310 TFEU ( former 238 EC) does not talk about association agreements. Please get someone who knows about the treaties to contribute.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.116.9.60 (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC) 

Kosovo?

This is a clear violation of the neutrality of the article.

Kosovo is depicted as if a fully independent country and southern neighbor of Serbia, and not in a neutral manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.110.240.97 (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Map Update

needed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.167.148.218 (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Syria CA

Hi @Rob984: I reverted your edit moving Syria. While I agree that based on the treaty title it might seem that it isn't an AA, my research when constructing this list led me to conclude otherwise. Most importantly, this (now dead) link listed 6 CAs (5 of which are no longer in force) as meeting the definition of AA. According to that article, the definition of an AA is an agreement for which "The legal basis for their conclusion is Article 310 (ex 238) TEC;" (which is the case for the Syrian CA: [1]). Whether that is a necessary or sufficient condition I don't know, nor how this applies to other CAs in force. TDL (talk) 02:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Union Association Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140426235959/http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/ to http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)