Talk:European Parliamentary Technology Assessment

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Parliamentary Technology Assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

added appropriate current links, no need to refer to Web Archive --Mnent (talk) 07:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Secondary sources needed, too many primary sources

edit

There are too many primary sources in this article. These sources are also irrelevant to the claims in this article. Although they prove that some institute exists, it doesn't prove that they are members of this organization. Furthermore, linking to the main page of the organization's website is not appropriate to demonstrate anything reliably. Articles from journals and newspapers are more appropriate. Sociable Song (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are correct. I shall try to find the respective subpages of the members institutions, however, I know that not all of them have such pages. The most reliable source is that these member institutions are listed as "members" on the official homepage of the EPTA network. There is not much published on the network to add other than primary sources. I will do my best to finde some articles worth citing. --Mnent (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply