Talk:European Bioinformatics Institute

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled] edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The number of staff should be 500 - but this has been changed to 800 by someone (incorrect). Themarytodd (talk) 15:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)themarytoddReply

Wishes (Fishes) edit

What about a history of the EBI and a list of the services they provide and a list of grants they consume? --Dan|^(talk) 12:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Alphabetize the list of groups? --141.14.26.126 09:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I tried hard to see if there was a way around this but the copied content comes from a site that is dated 1999 - and content in the archive from 2003. It is definitely not a reverse cv and would need to be rewritten entirely. original, archived. There is also no good version to restore it to as the rest are also some variant of copyvio or promotional. Praxidicae (talk) 16:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic