Talk:Eugenia Wang

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reason for {{hangon}} edit

Article does not meet criteria for suggested speedy deletion. There is sufficient context to identify Dr. Wang as an important individual in the field of biology researching aging. The text of this article is nowhere close to being as useless or hazy as "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." Further, if the nominator for speedy deletion was worried about notability (which isn't addressed by speedies), that shouldn't be a problem as Dr. Wang was responsible for six major paper publications in journals last year alone. (Search PubMed for Eugenia Wang here: [1])KhalfaniKhaldun 04:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eugenia Wang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply